ADA laws in Missouri apply to websites through federal law, primarily Title II and Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Private businesses with physical locations open to the public are evaluated under Title III when their websites are tied to those locations. State and local government entities in Missouri fall under Title II and, as of April 24, 2024, must comply with a binding U.S. Department of Justice rule requiring websites and mobile apps to meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA.
Missouri does not have a separate state statute that establishes technical website accessibility standards for private businesses. Most website accessibility lawsuits are filed in federal court and seek injunctive relief and attorney’s fees rather than compensatory damages. Settlements commonly require WCAG-based remediation, third-party audits, and documented accessibility policies. Compliance costs vary by site size and complexity, but litigation often exceeds the cost of proactive remediation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes, when the website is connected to a physical place of public accommodation such as a retail store, restaurant, hotel, medical office, or service provider. Courts analyze these cases under ADA Title III.
No. Missouri does not have a separate digital accessibility statute setting technical standards for private websites. Most claims rely on the federal ADA.
Most settlements and court orders reference WCAG 2.0 AA or WCAG 2.1 AA. Under the DOJ’s April 24, 2024 rule, Missouri state and local government entities must comply with WCAG 2.1 Level AA.
State agencies, counties, cities, public school districts, and public colleges and universities must comply. Deadlines depend on population size.
Yes. ADA Title III does not include a revenue-based exemption. Small and mid-size businesses can face website accessibility claims.
Under federal Title III, private plaintiffs generally seek injunctive relief and attorney’s fees. Compensatory damages are not typically available in private ADA Title III cases.
Yes. If goods or services are offered through a mobile app, accessibility obligations extend to that platform.
No. Overlay tools do not fix underlying code barriers and have not been treated as a complete legal defense to ADA claims.
Small informational sites may cost several thousand dollars to audit and remediate. Larger ecommerce or government platforms can require significantly higher investment. Litigation frequently costs more than proactive compliance.
Structured WCAG 2.1 AA audits, documented remediation, manual keyboard and screen reader testing, and ongoing monitoring reduce risk. Compliance requires continuous maintenance rather than a one-time fix.
Comments
Log in to add a comment.